Remote Sensing Applications in Satellite Oceanography

Satellite remote sensing provides repeated global observations of key ocean surface variables. These observations are complementary to in situ measurements. In fact, remotely sensed information fills some in situ gaps in temporal and spatial coverage, while in situ measurements, being a point-wise source of information, provide critical ground-truth for satellite retrievals calibration and validation. Advances in satellite ocean technology and algorithm research make satellite remote sensing an indispensable tool for environmental monitoring of the open and coastal ocean. Moreover, remotely sensed products support the interpretation and the prediction of oceanic phenomena that occur at regional and mesoscales in a synoptic way. In this chapter, we introduce basics of satellite oceanography, including the most used satellite orbits, the range of frequencies involved, and the processing levels related to the remote sensed products. Then, selected ocean products and their applications, from ocean color to infrared observations of sea surface temperature, passive microwaves, and altimetry, are addressed. Finally, a special attention is devoted to synthetic aperture radars (SARs) and the emerging role of microsatellites in observing ocean variables and, in particular, wind speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 106.99 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 137.14 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 137.14 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Ocean Remote Sensing: Concept to Realization for Physical Oceanographic Studies

Chapter © 2018

Recent Trends in Ocean Observations

Chapter © 2018

Satellite Remote Sensing in Offshore Wind Energy

Chapter © 2013

References

  1. Martin S (2014) An introduction to ocean remote sensing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
  2. Sammartino M, Marullo S, Santoleri R, Scardi M (2018) Modelling the vertical distribution of phytoplankton biomass in the Mediterranean Sea from satellite data: a neural network approach. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:1666 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Nardelli B et al (2020) A deep learning network to retrieve ocean hydrographic profiles from combined satellite and in situ measurements – personal communication. J Geophys Res 12:3151 Google Scholar
  4. Le Traon PY, Reppucci A, Fanjul EA, Aouf L, Behrens A, Belmonte M et al (2019) From observation to information and users: the Copernicus marine service perspective. Front Mar Sci 6:234 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Robinson IS (2010) Discovering the ocean from space: the unique applications of satellite oceanography. Springer, Berlin, p 685 BookGoogle Scholar
  6. Robinson IS (2004) Measuring the ocean from space: the principles and methods of satellite oceanography. Springer, Berlin, p 669 Google Scholar
  7. Parkinson C, Ward A, King M (2006) Earth science reference handbook: a guide to NASA's earth science program and earth observing satellite missions. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, p 277 Google Scholar
  8. Groom et al (2019) Satellite Ocean colour: current status and future perspective. Front Mar Sci 6:485 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dierssen HM, Radolph K, Lewis E (2013) Remote sensing of ocean colour. In: Orcutt J (ed) Earth system monitoring: selected entries from the encyclopedia 439 of sustainability science and technology. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  10. Donlon C, Berruti B, Buongiorno A, Ferreira MH, Femenias P, Frerick J et al (2012) The global monitoring for environment and security (GMES) Sentinel-3 mission. Remote Sens Environ 120:37–57 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Ruddick K, Neukermans G, Vanhellemont Q, Jolivet D (2014) Challenges and opportunities for geostationary ocean colour remote sensing of regional seas: a review of recent results. Remote Sens Environ 146:63–76 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Cotroneo Y, Aulicino G, Ruiz S, Pascual A, Budillon G, Fusco G, Tintoré J (2016) Glider and satellite high resolution monitoring of a mesoscale eddy in the algerian basin: effects on the mixed layer depth and biochemistry. J Mar Syst 162:73–88 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Rivaro P, Ianni C, Langone L, Ori C, Aulicino G, Cotroneo Y, Saggiomo M, Mangoni O (2017) Physical and biological forcing of mesoscale variability in the carbonate system of the Ross Sea (Antarctica) during summer 2014. J Mar Syst 166:144–158 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. de Ruggiero P, Napolitano E, Iacono R, Pierini S (2016) A high-resolution modelling study of the circulation along the Campania coastal system, with a special focus on the Gulf of Naples. Cont Shelf Res 122:85–101 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Minnett PJ et al (2019) Half a century of satellite remote sensing of sea-surface temperature. Remote Sens Environ 2019:233 Google Scholar
  16. Donlon CJ et al (2007) The global ocean data assimilation experiment high-Resolution Sea surface temperature pilot project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1197–1213 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilpatrick KA, Podestá G, Walsh S, Williams E, Halliwell V, Szczodrak M, Brown OB, Minnett PJ, Evans R (2015) A decade of sea surface temperature from MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 165:27–41 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Walton CC, Pichel WG, Sapper JF, May DA (1998) The development and operational application of nonlinear algorithms for the measurement of sea surface temperatures with the NOAA polar-orbiting environmental satellites. J Geophys Res 103(27):999–928,012 Google Scholar
  19. Berry D, Corlett G, Embury O, Merchant C (2018) Stability assessment of the (a)ATSR Sea surface temperature climate dataset from the European Space Agency climate change initiative. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:126 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Llewellyn-Jones DT, Minnett PJ, Saunders RW, Zavody AM (1984) Satellite multichannel infrared measurements of sea surface temperature of the N.E. Atlantic Ocean using AVHRR/2. Q.J.R. Meteorol Soc 110:613–631 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall DK, Key JR, Casey KA, Riggs GA, Cavalieri DJ (2004) Sea-ice surface temperature product from MODIS. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42:1076–1087 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Preußer A, Willmes S, Heinemann G, Paul S (2015) Thin ice dynamics and ice production in the Storfjorden polynya for winter seasons 2002/2003–2013/2014 using MODIS thermal infrared imagery. Cryosphere 9:1063–1073 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Aulicino G, Sansiviero M, Paul S, Cesarano C, Fusco G, Wadhams P, Budillon G (2018a) A new approach for monitoring the Terra Nova Bay polynya through MODIS ice surface temperature imagery and its validation during 2010 and 2011 winter seasons. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:366 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Sansiviero M, Morales Maqueda MÁ, Fusco G, Aulicino G, Flocco D, Budillon G (2017) Modelling Sea ice formation in the Terra Nova Bay polynya. J Mar Syst 166:4–25 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Parmiggiani F (2006) Fluctuations of Terra Nova Bay polynya as observed by active (ASAR) and passive (AMSR-E) microwave radiometers. Int J Remote Sens 27:2459–2467 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Aulicino G, Wadhams P, Parmiggiani F (2019a) SAR pancake ice thickness retrieval in the terra nova bay (Antarctica) during the PIPERS expedition in winter 2017. Remote Sens (Basel) 11:2510 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Stewart RH (1985) Methods of satellite oceanography. University of California Press, Berkeley Google Scholar
  28. Brodzik MJ, Long DG, Hardman MA, Paget A, Armstrong R (2018) MEaSUREs calibrated enhanced-resolution passive microwave daily EASE-grid 2.0 brightness temperature ESDR, version 1. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, Boulder Google Scholar
  29. Wentz FJ (1997) A well calibrated ocean algorithm for special sensor microwave/imager. J Geophys Res 102:8703–8718 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricciardulli L, Wentz FJ (2015) Ascatterometer geophysical model function for climate-quality winds: QuikSCAT Ku-2011. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 32:1829–1846 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fu LL, Lee T, Liu WT, Kwok R (2019) 50 years of satellite remote sensing of the ocean. Meteorol Monogr 59:1–46 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mecklenburg S et al (2012) ESA’s soil moisture and ocean salinity Mission: Mission performance and operations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50:1354–1366 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Vine DM, Lagerloef GSE, Colomb FR et al (2007) Aquarius: an instrument to monitor sea surface salinity from space. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45:2040–2050 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Entekhabi D et al (2010) The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission. Proc IEEE 98:704–716 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Soldo Y, Cabot F, Rougé B, Kerr YH, Al Bitar A, Epaillard E (2013) SMOS-NEXT: a new concept for soil moisture retrieval from passive interferometric observations. Eur Astron Soc Publ Ser 59:203–212 Google Scholar
  36. Alvera-Azcarate A, Barth A, Parard G, Beckers J-M (2016) Analysis of SMOS Sea surface salinity data using DINEOF. Remote Sens Environ 180:137–145 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Olmedo E, Martínez J, Turiel A, Ballabrera-Poy J, Portabella M (2017) Debiased non-Bayesian retrieval: a novel approach to SMOS Sea surface salinity. Remote Sens Environ 193:103–126 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Olmedo E, Taupier-Letage I, Turiel A, Alvera-Azcaràte A (2018) Improving SMOS Sea surface salinity in the Western Mediterranean Sea through multivariate and multifractal analysis. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:485 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  39. Aulicino G, Cotroneo Y, Olmedo E, Cesarano C, Fusco G, Budillon G (2019b) In situ and Satellite Sea surface salinity in the Algerian Basin observed through ABACUS glider measurements and BEC SMOS regional products. Remote Sens (Basel) 11:1361 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Grodsky SA, Reul N, Lagerloef G, Reverdin G, Carton JA, Chapron B, Quilfen Y, Kudryavtsev VN, Kao H-Y (2012) Haline hurricane wake in the Amazon/Orinoco plume: AQUARIUS/SACD and SMOS observation. Geophys Res Lett 39:L20603 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaleschke L, Tian-Kunze X, Maaß N, Mäkynen M, Drusch M (2012) Sea ice thickness retrieval from SMOS brightness temperatures during the Arctic freeze-up period. Geophys Res Lett 39:L05501 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  42. Mäkynen M et al (2020) Satellite observations for detecting and forecasting sea-ice conditions: a summary of advances made in the SPICES project by the EU’s horizon 2020 programme. Remote Sens (Basel) 12:1214 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  43. Le Vine DM, Dinnat EP, Meissner T, Wentz FJ, Kao HY, Lagerloef G, Lee T (2018) Status of Aquarius and salinity continuity. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:1585 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  44. Meissner T, Wentz FJ, Le Vine DM (2018) The salinity retrieval algorithms for the NASA Aquarius version 5 and SMAP version 3 releases. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:1121 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  45. Dinnat EP, Le Vine DM, Boutin J, Meissner T, Lagerloef G (2019) Remote sensing of sea surface salinity: comparison of satellite and in situ observations and impact of retrieval parameters. Remote Sens (Basel) 11:750 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  46. Cerrone D, Fusco G, Simmonds I, Aulicino G, Budillon G (2017) Dominant covarying climate signals in the southern ocean and antarctic sea ice influence during the last three decades. J Climate 30:3055–3072 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  47. Wadhams P, Aulicino G, Parmiggiani F, Persson POG, Holt B (2018) Pancake ice thickness mapping in the Beaufort Sea from wave dispersion observed in SAR imagery. J Geophys Res Oceans 123:2213–2237 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  48. Tateyama K, Enomoto H, Toyota T, Uto S (2002) Sea ice thickness estimated from passive microwave radiometers. Polar Meteorol Glaciol 16:15–31 Google Scholar
  49. Martin S, Drucker R, Kwok R, Holt B (2004) Estimation of the thin ice thickness and heat fluxes for the Chukchi Sea Alaskan coast polynya from SSM/I data, 1990–2001. J Geophys Res 109:C10012-1–C10012-15 ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. Naoki K, Ukita J, Nishio F, Nakayama M, Comiso JC, Gasiewski AJ (2008) Thin sea ice thickness as inferred from passive microwave and in situ observations. J Geophys Res 113:C02S16-1–C02S16-11 Google Scholar
  51. Aulicino G, Fusco G, Kern S, Budillon G (2014) Estimation of sea-ice thickness in Ross and Weddell seas from SSM/I brightness temperatures. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52:4122–4140 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  52. Richards JA (2009) Remote sensing with imaging radar. Signals and communication technology series. Springer, Berlin BookGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee JS, Pottier E (2009) Polarimetric radar imaging: from basics to applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton BookGoogle Scholar
  54. Filippazzo G, Dinand S (2017) The potential impact of small satellite radar constellations on traditional space systems. In: 5th federated and fractionated satellite systems workshop, Toulouse Google Scholar
  55. Kramer HJ, Cracknell AP (2008) An overview of small satellites in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 29(15):4285–4337 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Peral E et al (2018) Radar technologies for Earth remote sensing from CubeSat platforms. Proc IEEE 106(3):404–418 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Paek SW, Balasubramanian S, Kim S, de Weck O (2020) Small-satellite synthetic aperture radar for continuous global Biospheric monitoring: a review. Remote Sens (Basel) 12:2546 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  58. Deepak RA, Twiggs RJ (2012) Thinking out of the box: space science beyond the CubeSat. J Small Satell 1:3–7 ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. Apel JR (1987) Principles of ocean physics, vol 38. Academic, New York Google Scholar
  60. Wackerman CC et al (1996) Wind vector retrieval using ERS-1 synthetic aperture radar imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 34(6):1343–1352 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  61. Grieco G, Nirchio F, Migliaccio M (2015) Application of state-of-the- art SAR X-band geophysical model functions (GMFs) for sea surface wind (SSW) speed retrieval to a data set of the Italian satellite mission COSMO-SkyMed. Int J Remote Sens 36(9):2296–2312 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Kerbaol V, Chapron B, Vachon PW (1998) Analysis of ERS-1/2 synthetic aperture radar wave mode images. J Geophys Res Ocean 103(C4):7833–7846 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  63. Grieco G, Lin W, Migliaccio M, Nirchio F, Portabella M (2016) Dependency of the Sentinel-1 azimuth wavelength cut-off on significant wave height and wind speed. Int J Remote Sens 37(21):5086–5104 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Corcione V, Grieco G, Portabella M, Nunziata F, Migliaccio M (2019) A novel azimuth cutoff implementation to Retrieve Sea surface wind speed from SAR imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 57(6):3331–3340 ArticleADSGoogle Scholar
  65. Abdallah S et al (2021) Altimetry for the future: building on 25 years of progress. Advances on space research 68(2):319–363. Google Scholar
  66. Aulicino G, Cotroneo Y, Ruiz S, Román AS, Pascual A, Fusco G, Tintoré J, Budillon G (2018b) Monitoring the Algerian Basin through glider observations, satellite altimetry and numerical simulations along a SARAL/AltiKa track. J Mar Syst 179:55–71 ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Taburet G, Sanchez-Roman A, Ballarotta M, Pujol M-I, Legeais J-F, Fournier F et al (2019) Duacs dt-2018: 25 years of reprocessed sea level altimeter products. Ocean Sci Discuss 2019:1–30 Google Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Technology, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, Naples, Italy Giuseppe Aulicino, Yuri Cotroneo, Paola de Ruggiero & Giannetta Fusco
  2. Department of Engineering, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy Andrea Buono, Valeria Corcione & Ferdinando Nunziata
  1. Giuseppe Aulicino